CO129-258 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [1-4] — Page 735

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

blame), I still maintain that it was improper for him to take payment repeatedly without rendering an account for it. Occupying himself (perfectly possible, I admit) with detecting by means of a room search, as he did, he worked under my occasional observation only, and even had I detected him in the act of receiving money, I might well have imagined that it was a private payment from some of the tenants of his houses.

With reference to my letter of 22nd March 1892, it might perhaps have been urged that, as the Treasurer has now only Treasury duties to attend to, he ought to have sufficient time at his disposal to check revenue, at any rate to a considerable extent, irrespective of whether the same work is being also performed by the Local Auditor or not.

I am unable to say with what expenditure of time former Treasurers were satisfied, but apart altogether from the question of the utility of performing the same work twice over, I can unhesitatingly assert that the requirements of Somerset House have to be complied with, and that, owing to the withdrawal of the Audit Office and subsequently the Reference Clerk from the Colonial Secretary's office, every document connected in any way with finance is now sent to the Treasurer for his consideration. I find, so far, that the work

Edit History

2026-05-27 00:53:32 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
blame), I still maintain that it was improper for him to take payment repeatedly without rendering an account for it. Occupying himself (perfectly possible, I admit) with detecting by means of a room search, as he did, he worked under my occasional observation only, and even had I detected him in the act of receiving money, I might well have imagined that it was a private payment from some of the tenants of his houses. With reference to my letter of 22nd March 1892, it might perhaps have been urged that, as the Treasurer has now only Treasury duties to attend to, he ought to have sufficient time at his disposal to check revenue, at any rate to a considerable extent, irrespective of whether the same work is being also performed by the Local Auditor or not. I am unable to say with what expenditure of time former Treasurers were satisfied, but apart altogether from the question of the utility of performing the same work twice over, I can unhesitatingly assert that the requirements of Somerset House have to be complied with, and that, owing to the withdrawal of the Audit Office and subsequently the Reference Clerk from the Colonial Secretary's office, every document connected in any way with finance is now sent to the Treasurer for his consideration. I find, so far, that the work
Baseline (Original)
blame), I stile maintain that it was for him to take payment repeatedly without it. Occupying himself ( perfectly pooochle my detecting by a room as he did, he under way my only occasionally observation and even had I detected him in the act of Uceiving money, I might well have imagined that it was private payment from some of the tenants of his hores. With reference to my letter 11. it might of 22th of March 1892, perhaps have been urged that, as the Treasurer has now only Treasury duties to attend to, he ought to have sufficient time at his disposal him to check revenue, at I rate to al to enable any a considerable extend, irrespective 729 irrespective of whether the same work is being also performed by the Local Auditor or not 12. I am unable to say with what expenditure of time over their wvere former Treasurers satisfied but apart altogether from the question of the utility of performing the same work tuice over) I can unhesitatingly arsert that the requirements that Now of Somerset House have to be and that, owing Complied wit to the withdrawal of the Audit Office and subsequently the Reference Clerk from the Colonial Secretary's office, every document connected in with finance is now any way sent to the Treasurer for his Consideration. Ifind, so far, that the work $
2026-05-27 00:53:32 · Baseline
View content

blame), I stile maintain

that it was

for him to take payment repeatedly without

it. Occupying himself

(

perfectly pooochle

my detecting by

a room

as he did, he

under

way

my

only occasionally observation and even had I detected him in the act of Uceiving money, I might well have imagined that it was private payment from some of the tenants of his

hores.

With reference to

my

letter

11.

it might

of 22th of March 1892, perhaps have been urged that, as the Treasurer has now

only Treasury duties to attend to, he ought to have sufficient

time at his

disposal him to check revenue, at

I rate to

al to enable

any a considerable extend,

irrespective

729

irrespective of whether the same work is being also performed by the Local Auditor

or not

12. I am unable to

say

with

what expenditure of time over

their

wvere

former Treasurers satisfied but apart altogether from the question of the utility of performing the same

work tuice over)

I can unhesitatingly arsert

that the requirements

that

Now

of Somerset House have to be

and that, owing

Complied wit

to the withdrawal of the Audit Office and subsequently the Reference Clerk from the Colonial Secretary's office,

every

document connected in

with finance is now any way sent to the Treasurer for his Consideration. Ifind, so far, that

the work

$

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.